[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Child Support Report - ***Secretary Shalala Salutes Nation's Child Support Program Employees President Clinton Sends Best Wishes to the Child Support Community Silent Auction Makes a Loud Noise for Kids in North Dakota Kids Show They Care About Their Noncustodial Parents Allocation of Support Withheld from Pay Among Multiple Families Voluntary Acknowledgement in Delaware Customer Satisfaction Handbook on Customer Service Fifth National Conference Delivers the Goods The Value of Training August is National Child Support Awareness Month Return to top of
newsletter
Secretary Shalala Salutes Nation's Child Support Program EmployeesSpeaking on July 12th to nearly 500 CSE professionals from across the country at a luncheon celebrating the Child Support Enforcement Program's 20th anniversary, HHS Secretary Donna Shalala paid tribute to OCSE's state and local partners. You know child support in America, she said to those she called the real frontline troops. " You know the needs of our children. Every day you live and breathe the needs of families for whom the prompt and full payment of child support becomes an issue of survival. You see the anguished faces of parents fighting to go it alone to stay just above the poverty line. You see the confusion, the bewilderment of young children caught in emotional and financial squeeze plays. You know firsthand that child support is about moneyfor clothing, food, utility bills, day care, school field trips. But you also know that child support is about much more than money. It's about engagement and involvement in a child's life, emotional support, love, and understanding. It's about both parents being a part of a child's life. The Honorable Russell B. Long, former Louisiana Senator and the legislative force behind the pivotal 1975 child support enforcement law, also addressed the gathering. Senator Long, warmly received by an audience that included many with keen memories of his contributions, recalled some of the legislative debate that resulted in the new law and a national Child Support Enforcement Program. I never dreamed then, he said, that our efforts would bear fruit of the magnitude I see today. In addition to the remarks of Secretary Shalala and Senator Long, congratulatory messages from President Clinton (see page 2) and former President Ford (see July CSR) were read to the assembled guests by Mary Jo Bane, Assistant Secretary for Children and Families. You know that child support is about much more than money. . . It's about both parents being a part of a child's life. OCSE Deputy Director David Gray Ross acknowledged the achievements of his predecessors, many of whom were in the audience, and thanked all of the participants for providing hope and support to America's children since 1975. Return to top of
newsletter
President Clinton Sends Best Wishes to the Child Support CommunityGreetings to everyone gathered in our nation's capital to mark the 20th anniversary of the national Child Support Enforcement Program of the Department of Health and Human Services. I commend you for your efforts to put America's children first Children are our greatest hope and our most profound responsibility. Only when our young people are provided with the best upbringing possible can we truly say that we are prepared for the challenges of the 21st century. Yet, sadly, many Americans avoid their responsibility to provide basic economic support to their children. Strong child support enforcement measures are crucial not only because they help provide children with economic security, but also because they send a clear signal to young men and young women that they should not have children until they are prepared to care for them. And those who do have children must not be permitted to walk away from them. Governments don't raise children; parents do. We cannot rest until parents across our nation begin to shoulder that responsibility. We must act now to give our children the future they deserve. I commend you for your efforts to put America's children first. Best wishes for a wonderful anniversary and for much continued success -- Bill Clinton. Return to top of
newsletter
Silent Auction Makes a Loud Noise for Kids in North DakotaA Silent Auction held during North Dakota's 1995 Family Support Council (NDFSC) conference in Bismarck attracted 150 bidders and raised $2,144 to benefit North Dakota children. Ronald McDonald House in Bismarck received $1,123 from the auction, with the remaining $1,021 going to a local branch of the national Blue Cross/Blue Shield Caring for Children Program. Never heard of a Silent Auction? Here's how it works in North Dakota. Conference planners solicit local businesses for donations of goods to be auctioned off. (Bismarck merchants were generous: donations included jewelry, kitchenware, furnishings, sports and automotive equipment.) The itemseach with its own bid sheetwere displayed on a special bid table for the first two days of the conference. Bids were entered until 9 p.m. of the second evening. See something you'd like? Write down your name and the amount of your bid on the sheet. Some items carry minimum bid requirements. And raises must be in $1 to $5 increments, depending on the item. You can bid as often as you like, or as necessary to protect your interests. As closing time approaches and unscrupulous sorts try to beat you out of your prize(s), it's a good idea to hang around the bid table to make sure yours is the last bid. A smile is permitted as you cart off the loot. This Silent Auctiona terrific ice-breakerstands out, in the words of one participant, NCSEA's incoming president Sue Bailey, "as an example of how a conference activity can be fun, serve a community, and enhance child support enforcement's public image, all at the same time. Bailey enjoyed it so much she's planning to have one at the NCSEA conference in Kansas City. Congratulations to all those in the photo and to everyone else in Bismarck who helped make NDFSC's conference a memorable event and a special time for North Dakota children. Return to top of
newsletter
Kids Show They Care About Their Noncustodial ParentsEveryone a Winner in MO-KAN Contest In the mid 1980s, the Missouri and Kansas child support offices, on both sides of the state line, formed a collaborative partnership called the MO-KAN Child Support Council. The mission of the Council is to share child support information through projects that promote positive relationships between children and their noncustodial parents. MO-KAN feels that when children have good relationships with their noncustodial parents, the parents are more likely to provide financial, as well as emotional, support to their children. This positive attitude has paid off for over 100 children and their parents through the Kids Care contest sponsored by the Council. Now in its third successful year, children ages 2-6 are asked to draw a picture showing some activity they enjoy doing with their noncustodial parent. Children ages 7-18 are asked to write a letter telling why they think their noncustodial parent is great. A party is held in August for all those who enter the contest. Winners are selected from four age categories and receive a family fun pack of prizes donated by Kansas City corporations and business owners. In addition, all children who enter receive a prize. The Johnson County, Kansas Bar Association provides a donation to cover printing costs, and media coverage is sponsored by local radio and television stations. Kids Care, and so do parents....as the letters below demonstrate. Dear Dad, Dear Kids Care, My dad is very important to me because he helps me go to sleep every time I'm over at his house. (My mom and dad are divorced.) He is very nice and funny. We go do things together. I play catch with him a lot, but the best thing I like about him is his hug, there is something magical about it. If I can't get to sleep I call him. He's sort of like my backup if my mom can't help me. He takes me to a lot of places. I love to play with him and sometimes when I'm talking to him on the phone I cry. Sometimes my dad makes mistakes, but we make mistakes sometimes. I love him very much. Andrew Spitsnagle (age 7). The best thing I like about him is his hug, there is something magical about it. To All Whom This Concerns: I am writing today to offer your staff my deepest gratitude for the essay contest and reception that I attended last Friday at the Johnson County Courthouse. A letter is inadequate to express my feelings, but I would like to try. Your efforts and concerns, and the love and caring for the families you serve are quite apparent to me. The time I spent with Andrew last Friday was priceless, and the memories will last a lifetime. I had not seen the entry that my son sent in before arriving, and reading it was a deeply moving experience. His letter was the most wonderful expression of love I have ever read. As Andrew wrote in his entry, our experience Friday was magical. Thank you so very much for making my boy and me feel so alive, loved, and important. God truly blessed our family through your efforts. Sincerely, Steve Spitsnagle. To learn more about the MO-KAN Child Support Council and the Kids Care Contest, contact Mrs. Peggy Elliott, Johnson County Court Trustee at (913) 764-8484, ext. 5126. Return to top of
newsletter
Allocation of Support Withheld from Pay Among Multiple Families
By: Jeff Ball For all garnishments and income withholdings, the upper limit on what may be withheld is based on the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (CCPA). The Federal Consumer Credit Protection ActThe garnishment/withholding federal limits for child support and alimony are based on the aggregate disposable weekly earnings (ADWE) of the obligor/debtor. The ADWE is figured by taking the debtor's gross earnings (wages, bonuses, commissions, pensions) and subtracting taxes and mandatory retirement deductions.Health insurance premiums, union dues, other child support garnishments, and money owed to the employer are not deductible when determining the federal ADWE. However, a state may allow these items to be deductible when determining the state ADWE, since the federal CCPA limit is only a ceiling. In computing the ADWE, if an employee is paid biweekly, the biweekly check is divided by 2 to equal the ADWE; if paid semi-monthly, by 2.15; and if paid monthly, by 4.3. The federal CCPA limit is 50% of the ADWE if the debtor supports a second family and 60% if the debtor does not. The limit increases to 55% and 65% respectively if the debtor owes arrearages that are 12 weeks or more past due. Again, states may choose a lower limit. About two-thirds of the states use the federal limits, and about one-third cap the withholding at 50% regardless of second families or age of arrearages. The CCPA covers wage-related and retirement income only. Interest from a savings account, for instance, isn't covered by the CCPA. If a state has a broad income withholding definition that includes interest or other periodic or lump sum payments, the state's law may permit the agency to withhold all or part of those types of income, subject to state personal property exemption claims. Interstate WithholdingInterstate income withholding can add complications. Regardless of the method used to get a withholding order/notice enforced in a second state (e.g., URESA registration, interstate income withholding, UIFSA registration, UIFSA direct withholding), federal regulations require the law of the state in which the obligor is employed to govern the allocation formula and the CCPA limits.Which state is the state of employment? A consensus among participants at a 1994 OCSE-sponsored retreat on UIFSA direct withholding recommended that the state of employment be the employee's work-site state. This should be the case even when the payroll office, the office at which process was served, or company headquarters is in another state. Here's how this would work. Two withholding orders from states A
and B respectively are served on the employer at headquarters in
state C. The employee works in state D but lives in state E. The law
of state D should govern the multiple order allocation and CCPA limit
because D is the state in which the obligor actually works.
Assuming the employer does business only in states C and D, either
state is acceptable for service of the withholding order or notice;
but since, in this example, the employee works in state D, it
generally makes more sense to serve the employer in that state.
In response to requirements of the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of
1993 (see November '93 CSR), Delaware lawmakers passed legislation,
effective January 1, 1995, which created a presumption of paternity.
This presumption is rebuttable only by clear and convincing evidence
and only under the following conditions:
If the Acknowledgement of Paternity is not rebutted within the
time frames stated, the presumption of paternity is final, binding,
conclusive, and determinative of the child's paternity.
Before the new law was signed by Delaware's Governor Thomas R.
Carper, IV-D Director Barbara Paulin and her staff, working with a
contractor, prepared for implementation. During November and December
1994, the following tasks were completed to ensure the program's
success:
The Voluntary Acknowledgement of Paternity Program was
implemented on schedule, January 1, 1995. To expedite the process,
acknowledgement of paternity forms, brochures, and notary public
services were made available at all birthing facilities, vital
statistic and child support enforcement offices, and two state
service centers.
When a parent signs an acknowledgement, the form is sent directly
to vital statistics in Dover, Delaware, which is responsible for
recording and amending all birth certificates. Routing
acknowledgements to them allows for a validity review before the form
is sent on to the Division of Child Support Enforcement. Required
data elements are then entered into a separate statewide database.
By allowing child support to access this information, staff can
identify an acknowledgement quickly and make a determination on how
to proceed with the case.
The program was implemented smoothly and without major problems,
thanks in large part to the high level of automation achieved through
the combined efforts of state staff and contractors. This included
formalizing requirements; designing documents to identify programming
modifications; testing modifications to the system; training staff;
and developing numerous system-generated reports to support the
program.
In addition, a batch program was developed to match paternity
acknowledgements filed against child support enforcement cases in the
system. The system also allows caseworkers to generate a copy of the
acknowledgement, which is then used to demonstrate to the court that
an acknowledgement has been filed. The printed copy from the system
is a facsimile on which signatures are replaced with a message
indicating that the signatures are on file with the original
documents at the Office of Vital Statistics.
As of July 19, 482 acknowledgements have been processed, a rate
which should yield over 800 acknowledgements by the end of this year.
Of those 482 acknowledgements, 54, or 11 percent, have matched with
open child support enforcement cases, a rate which should yield
nearly 100 matches by the end of the year.
The best way to find out if customers are satisfied with service
is to ask them. And that is just what Australia's Child Support
Agency (CSA) did earlier this year. Over 14,000 customers were
randomly selected as potential participants in a telephone survey.
CSA wrote to each one, explaining the survey and giving each customer
an opportunity to withdraw from consideration.
Surprisingly, only 300 asked for their names to be removed from
the potential list, while some even phoned the agency to make sure
they would be included. From these respondents, CSA selected a
further random sample of 2,500, with equal numbers of custodial and
noncustodial parents, to be the actual participants in the survey.
To help with survey design and to make sure the right questions
were asked, CSA staff conducted focus groups around the country.
The results? Custodial parents expressed greater satisfaction
with services overall than noncustodial parents did, although they
would like to see improvements in communications and collections.
Noncustodial parent concerns tended to focus on CSA being more
sympathetic to them, their needs, and their circumstances. Clearly,
the survey turned up areas where CSA would like to improve its
performance.
And how will the agency know if services are getting better? This
survey is just the first part of a 3-year effort, with work scheduled
to commence soon on next year's.
CSA plans to use the current results as a benchmark in tracking
changes over the next three years in the way clients perceive
service.
The idea of surveying CSA clients is not new. Over the past six
years CSA has undertaken many surveys to determine how satisfied
customers are with specific areas of service, such as telephone
inquiries.
But the agency had never before asked clients to judge all
aspects of the services provided. Nor had both custodial and
noncustodial parents been targeted to determine whether their
perceptions and needs are different.
For more information about the survey, call Allyson Dutton at
(202) 401-4639; or Internet: ADutton @acf.dhhs.gov
Customer Service was the topic of the day May 24th for Regional
staff and IV-D directors and their staffs in Regions IX and X (San
Francisco and Seattle). The get-together included a lively discussion
of thoughts about and approaches to maximizing customer service at
the local level. IV-D directors sketched out the importance of
improving service to customers and outlined how measuring customer
satisfaction fits into their states' strategic plans. Most of the
states reported an interest in surveying customers to measure
satisfaction with services, while a few states had already begun, in
a preliminary way, to do it. In September CSR, SRSCSR Jan Jensen of
Washington State, who just completed a six-month detail in OCSE's
Seattle Regional Office looking at states' customer service
activities, will report on progress to date. For the participants at
that May 24th meeting Jan put together a handbook of information on
customer service, which includes sections on:
If you would like to know more about the handbook or states'
customer service experiences, contact Jan Jensen at (360) 586-3293;
Internet: jjensen@fcs.dshs.wa.gov
A 2-way satellite hookup gave everyone at OCSE's Fifth National
Conference a view of the future of conference communications. Held
July 10-12 in Washington, DC, the conference drew 250 participants
from 40 states. High tech wizardry hooked them up with an equal
number at the Southwestern Regional Support Enforcement Association
Annual Training Conference in Albuquerque.
For a few hours, nearly 500 CSE professionals could forget the
thousands of miles between them and share their experiences as
partners in service to the children of America.
Presented in conjunction with the Center for the Support of
Children, the conference treated participants to a string of dynamic,
goal-centered plenaries and workshops on everything from asset
identification to UIFSA.
The conference concluded with a luncheon and program celebrating
the 20th anniversary of the Child Support Enforcement Program, which
drew many former OCSE employees and managers.
OCSE's National Training Center's hard working staff would like to
thank everyone who attended for helping to make this Fifth National
Conference the best one yet.
Still available are a limited number of copies of the conference
notebook. If you would like a copy, or if you have any questions
about the conference or need further information, please get in touch
with Roy Nix of the National Training Center. Roy can be reached at
(202) 401-5685; or Internet RNix@acf.dhhs.gov.
The Value of Training
To hear you discuss your personal willingness to go the extra
mile in order to preserve the high level of credibility and
availability which you have established as trainers was an eye
opening experience for me. Your conversation [and example] made me
examine my own standards of performance as a state employee and make
some personal commitments of my own. Lizette Woods, Louisiana
Department of Social Services, Office of Family Support, Training
Section, to OCSE trainers Yvette Riddick, Roy Nix, Dianne Offett, and
Mae Rowlett, following the May 1995 Training of Trainers course
delivery. Want to get in on a good thing? Call Roy at (202) 401-5685.
President Clinton has proclaimed the month of August, 1995 National
Child Support Awareness Month and called upon all Americans to
observe it with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and
activities. |